Submit incident

AI hallucination and reliability failures

Definition

Hallucination incidents document cases where an AI system produced outputs that were factually incorrect, fabricated, or misleading in ways that caused measurable harm, material misrepresentation, or erosion of trust in a consequential context.

Included

  • False citations or fabricated legal, medical, or scientific references that were acted upon
  • Incorrect factual claims generated by AI that influenced decisions with real-world consequences
  • AI-generated content that misrepresented events, statistics, or named individuals
  • Failures in AI-powered navigation, diagnosis, or recommendation systems due to incorrect outputs
  • AI agents that confidently executed incorrect actions based on hallucinated facts

Excluded

  • Minor inaccuracies in low-stakes contexts with no material consequence
  • Outputs that were ambiguous or incomplete but not factually false
  • Failures of intent, tone, or style rather than factual accuracy
Hallucination incidents over time
Documented incidents per year of occurrence. *2026 to date.
Timeline chart: requires category field in dataset (planned)
Unit: incidents · Source: AI Incident Index v2026.09 · Counts reflect documented incidents, not prevalence

Incident records5

Nov 2025A Federal Judge Just Flagged ChatGPT in Immigration Use-of-Force ReportsOECDJul 2024Sichuan's Fake Disaster Reports Show How Cheap It Got to Manufacture PanicAIIDMay 2024One Swapped Syllable Nearly Rewrote a Genoa Corruption CaseAIIDApr 2024Turnitin Flagged 22 Million AI-Written Papers. No One Checked Its Math.OECDJan 2023Instagram's Translator Turned 'Praise Be to God' Into 'Palestinian Terrorists'AIAAIC
Browse all incidents →